• +44 (0) 117 970 1773
  • trevor@fenbrook.com
Twitter
Fenbrook Consulting
Fenbrook Consulting
RFID, wrisbands for festival payment and location based NFC
+44 (0) 117 970 1773
trevor@fenbrook.com
  • Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Testimonials
  • Our Services
    • Export Consulting
    • Public Sector Tendering
    • Sales & Marketing
    • NFC Solutions
    • RFID Solutions
      • Campus Card Schemes
    • Ticketing Solutions
      • Transport Ticketing
      • Event Ticketing
  • Blog
  • White Papers & Downloads
  • Contact Us
MENU CLOSE back  

UK Smart Ticketing – Mystery Shopper Project – Part 2

By Trevor Crotch-Harvey, 22.2.17

 

This is Part 2 of my blog post on the Mystery Shopper project on UK smart and mobile ticketing schemes during October – December 2016.

 

 

  1. Ticket products offered on cards are not what passengers want

 

One of the biggest discoveries of the project was how unattractive many of the ticket products offered on cards were.  Very few operators offered a day pass/ticket that could be loaded onto a card ahead of time, removing the need to carry/offer cash.  (This is a perceived benefit of smart ticketing frequently cited in Transport Focus reports.)  An exception to this was the Avon Day Rider product, but even this appeared unknown in its home market.

 

In city after city, the minimum product that could be loaded onto a card off bus was a weekly pass.  And there is a disconnect between products.  In one instance I wasn’t able to use the stored value I’d purchased on a card to load a day pass onto the same card – at the authority’s own travel office in a major station!  Apparently, the only way to achieve this was to present the card to a tram conductor, who issued me with a scrappy little paper ticket.  No wonder people aren’t using cards!

 

  1. PayPoint and Payzone have a long way to go

 

Most major cities in the UK have come to an arrangement with PayPoint or Payzone or both, to provide ticket loading facilities on local travel smart cards.  On the face of it, this is a good idea, adding at a stroke dozens of outlets where passengers can reload travel rights.  I wanted to test how well this is working in practice.

 

The result was disappointing.  Both schemes provide maps on their websites showing outlets with their terminals.  However, I found one outlet which no longer had a terminal, and one outlet for each scheme which had a terminal but did not top up cards.  I had to be super motivated to keep going to find an outlet which offered top ups – I’m not sure regular passengers would feel the same.  One outlet which did load stored value for me told me I was the first person to ask for this on over a year, and staff had not been shown what to do.  Only one outlet of five I tried said they got a number of requests to top up cards.  For this good idea to be worthwhile, the two schemes need to focus on a much slicker implementation.

 

  1. Contactless is embryonic

 

I only found one instance of a bus operator outside London accepting contactless bank cards as a means of payment – the 36 service operated by the Harrogate Bus Company (owned by Transdev) between Leeds and Ripon.  This implementation is the retail model, with a separate payment terminal, not the TfL model, where a contactless card can be presented to an Oyster reader.  I saw one person use it.  Bus operators are making announcements about their intention to roll out contactless, prompted by the government – it will be interesting to see how this is done and what the reaction of the travelling public will be.

 

  1. Scotland is getting its act together

 

I found Scotland more integrated and interoperable than England, albeit it has a much more manageable scale.  Scotrail cards are interoperable with Bramble, so can be used on the Glasgow subway.  I also bought a rail ticket online, which was downloaded onto my Scotrail card when I tapped a reader at a station gate.  Also in Glasgow, the First app works perfectly, allowing me, as a visitor, to purchase tickets/passes ahead of time and not have to worry about buying tickets.

 

However, there is no multi modal interoperability (between bus and subway) in Glasgow, but there is in Edinburgh (between bus and tram), although the latter is not ITSO.

 

  1. ENCTS is a lifeline

 

As an aside, I was struck by the common use of ENCTS cards outside morning peak hours.  It appeared to me the use of these cards was a lifeline to elderly passengers, who were getting out and about when they might not otherwise.

 

I did observe a confusing difference in the way some operators have implemented ENCTS.  Most do not issue a ticket to the passenger, but a few do.  Where the operator was isolated, this wasn’t an issue.  But in one city operators issuing tickets were in close proximity to others not issuing tickets.  This confused many passengers and the floor of the bus was littered with unclaimed tickets.  Is this so difficult to standardise?

 

  1. Fenbrook Gold Star

 

I like the Rambus ecebs card checker app – this is a useful, clear and user friendly way of checking what ticket products and stored value balances are held on cards.  I also like the First app.  These get Fenbrook bronze stars.

 

I like the Pop scheme in Tyne & Wear.  I was able to load stored value onto the purple Pop card at Newcastle station, and then use it on the Metro, bus, and Shields ferry.  The bus transactions were cash replacement, but the Metro had a daily cap of £4.60.  Pop gets the Fenbrook Silver Star.

 

But the Fenbrook Gold Star goes to Nottingham’s Robin Hood card.  I loaded stored value at a street TVM, and could use it on every bus and tram operators’ services.  All trips were flat fare, so it was a simple tap for each journey, with no need to interact with the driver.  And there was a daily multi modal cap of £4 – great value, very convenient, and efficient for the operator!

 

 

Let me know if you have any questions or comments about these experiences.  You can call us or contact us through the Fenbrook website if you want to discuss any of this further: www.fenbrook.com, or use the Contact Form from this website.

 

Fenbrook Consulting advises businesses about the commercial opportunities and technical requirements of Smart Ticketing and Near Field Communications

February 22, 2017By Trevor Crotch HarveyTransport TicketingLeave a comment
cashless paymentcontactless paymentmobile ticketingmodal shiftsmart cardssmart ticketingtransport appTransport Ticketing

About the author

touché completes Feasibility Study of smartphone/beacon ticketing in Bristol – Technical/OperationalUK Smart Ticketing – Mystery Shopper Project – Part 1

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

clear formSubmit

Recent Posts
  • NCT, touché and ITSO announce a smartphone and beacon ticketing trial in Nottingham
    October 31, 2018
  • touché completes Feasibility Study of smartphone/beacon ticketing in Bristol – Commercial
    June 25, 2018
  • touché completes Feasibility Study of smartphone/beacon ticketing in Bristol – Behavioural
    June 20, 2018
  • touché completes Feasibility Study of smartphone/beacon ticketing in Bristol – Technical/Operational
    June 15, 2018
Contact Fenbrook

Find us on:

TwitterLinkedinMailWebsite
  • Great 121 today with Trevor Crotch-Harvey. Thank you for sharing your experience and knowledge - you truly are a mentor. If you're connected to Trevor but not had a 121 with him make it a priority. Adrian Edmonds, MD, Free As A Bird, and Business Adviser
    Business Mentoring
  • Your UK smart ticketing safari was a real masterclass, and the knowledge of schemes across the UK that you displayed was most impressive – and professionally delivered. Richard Poynder, Owner, Smartex Ltd
    Smart Ticketing Masterclass
  • Well done!  Not only did you bring together a great line-up of speakers, you gave – as always – a really interesting and very well presented session on UK schemes.  A tour de force in more ways than one.  I know how hard it is to get speakers together and the strong line-up was really appreciated.  Most of the speakers acted like delegates for the majority of the time and the whole atmosphere was warm, interactive as well as being informative and interesting.  Very many thanks.
    Richard Poynder, Smartex
  • “Trevor is a natural networker and a real giver. He provided me with a high value referral recently and did a top effort. It was practically in the bag, and I just had to turn up! I am learning that there is a lot to Trevor, his experience and knowledge make his a desirable person to network with. And I haven’t forgotten that I promised him a nice bottle of wine!”

    Becky Hall, Owner, Business for Breakfast
  • “I have completed with Trevor two big projects about the contactless cards in the world. If you need new data on contactless and NFC technology that are unavailable – just call Trevor! It’s a real pleasure to make business with him and you have certainty of receiving the data of the highest quality. I highly appreciate his work and hope for further cooperation.”

    Michał Polasik, Polasik Research, Poland
  • “I worked with Trevor recently on a project for the UK Department for Transport looking at the costs and benefits of smart ticketing across the whole of England to inform DfT’s smart ticketing strategy. Trevor proved very helpful and well connected in the transport smart card industry both in the UK and abroad. I will not hesitate to hire Trevor again when the opportunity arises.”

    John Elliott, Head Public Sector Practice, Principal Consultant, Consult Hyperion
Copyright © Fenbrook Consulting 2014